Extension of Jurisdiction of High Courts to Union Territories
(1) Parliament may by law extend the jurisdiction of a High Court to, or exclude the jurisdiction of a High Court from, any Union territory. (2) Where the High Court of a State exercises jurisdiction in relation to a Union territory,—(a) nothing in this Constitution shall be construed as empowering the Legislature of the State to increase, restrict or abolish that jurisdiction; and (b) the reference in article 227 to the Governor shall, in relation to any rules, forms or tables for subordinate courts in that territory, be construed as a reference to the President.
What this Article actually means
How it shows up in everyday life
This is the specific mechanism behind arrangements like Puducherry falling under the Madras High Court, or various smaller UTs being covered by a nearby state's High Court, rather than each needing a completely separate judicial infrastructure.
Read alongside this one
Quick answers about Article 230
Can a state's own legislature change this jurisdictional arrangement over a UT?
The text above reproduces Article 230 of the Constitution of India as amended to date, for general educational reference. It is public-domain legislative text, but we recommend cross-checking the authoritative version at legislative.gov.in or india.gov.in before relying on it for a legal matter. The explanation, examples and FAQs are general information, not legal advice — consult a qualified advocate for guidance on your specific situation.