Protection of President and Governors
(1) The President, or the Governor or Rajpramukh of a State, shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office... (2) No criminal proceedings whatsoever shall be instituted or continued against the President, or the Governor of a State, in any court during his term of office. (3) No process for the arrest or imprisonment of the President, or the Governor of a State, shall issue from any court during his term of office. (4) No civil proceedings in which relief is claimed against the President, or the Governor of a State, shall be instituted during his term of office in any court in respect of any act done or purporting to be done by him in his personal capacity... until the expiration of two months next after notice in writing has been delivered to the President or the Governor...
What this Article actually means
How it shows up in everyday life
This is why you can challenge a government decision, policy, or order made in the President's or a Governor's name through the courts (via writ petitions against the government), even though you can't personally sue or criminally prosecute the individual holding that office while they remain in it.
Read alongside this one
Quick answers about Article 361
Does this mean a Governor can never be held accountable for anything?
Can I challenge a Governor's official decision in court while they're in office?
The text above reproduces Article 361 of the Constitution of India as amended to date, for general educational reference. It is public-domain legislative text, but we recommend cross-checking the authoritative version at legislative.gov.in or india.gov.in before relying on it for a legal matter. The explanation, examples and FAQs are general information, not legal advice — consult a qualified advocate for guidance on your specific situation.