When a court has to form an opinion on a point of foreign law, science, art, or the identity of handwriting or finger/thumb impressions, the opinion of a person specially skilled in that field is treated as a relevant fact — including, notably, digital and cyber-forensics expertise for things like hacked data or digital tampering.
- Explicit recognition of cyber-forensics experts reflects how central digital-crime investigation has become since the old Evidence Act was written in 1872.
If your case involves something technical (medical, forensic, digital/cyber), this is the provision that lets a qualified expert's opinion actually count as evidence, not just as background colour.
This is a plain-English summary, not verbatim statutory text. Adhikar is an independent citizen-awareness platform, not a Government of India website. Always verify against the bare Act (legislative.gov.in) or a qualified advocate before relying on this for an actual legal situation.