Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament
(1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure. (2) No officer or member of Parliament in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in Parliament shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.
What this Article actually means
How it shows up in everyday life
This is a key separation-of-powers principle — while courts can review whether a LAW Parliament passes is constitutionally valid, they generally can't intervene in questions about whether Parliament followed its own internal procedural rules correctly in getting there, respecting the legislature's autonomy over its own internal functioning.
Read alongside this one
Quick answers about Article 122
Does this mean courts can never review anything connected to Parliament's internal functioning?
The text above reproduces Article 122 of the Constitution of India as amended to date, for general educational reference. It is public-domain legislative text, but we recommend cross-checking the authoritative version at legislative.gov.in or india.gov.in before relying on it for a legal matter. The explanation, examples and FAQs are general information, not legal advice — consult a qualified advocate for guidance on your specific situation.