Restriction on Rights During Martial Law
Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Part, Parliament may by law indemnify any person in the service of the Union or of a State or any other person in respect of any act done by him in connection with the maintenance or restoration of order in any area within the territory of India where martial law was in force or validate any sentence passed, punishment inflicted, forfeiture ordered or other act done under martial law in such area.
What this Article actually means
How it shows up in everyday life
This is a rarely-invoked, largely theoretical provision in modern India's constitutional history — India has not seen a formal declaration of 'martial law' in this specific constitutional sense since independence (as distinct from Emergency declarations under Article 352, or President's Rule under Article 356, which are different mechanisms).
Read alongside this one
Quick answers about Article 34
Is 'martial law' under Article 34 the same as the National Emergency under Article 352?
The text above reproduces Article 34 of the Constitution of India as amended to date, for general educational reference. It is public-domain legislative text, but we recommend cross-checking the authoritative version at legislative.gov.in or india.gov.in before relying on it for a legal matter. The explanation, examples and FAQs are general information, not legal advice — consult a qualified advocate for guidance on your specific situation.